$194.9 Million

Rupert Grint Net Worth 2026

Last updated August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Rupert Grint has an estimated net worth of $194.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Disclosed salaries and documented backend, each with a citation
  • Undisclosed roles modeled from disclosed comparables for their era, budget band, and career stage
  • Backend, endorsements, and producing credits estimated from disclosed medians
Rupert Grint

Fast Facts

Birthdaten/a
Birthplacen/a
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 2001
Best KnownHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001)

Who Is Rupert Grint?

Rupert Grint is best known for Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001). The earnings behind Rupert's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Rupert's earning years from 2000 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2011 at about $28.3 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $194.9 Million today.

Data

Every line below is computed from public data and the published rate tables on our methodology page. Confidence: Grade C. Documented numbers cover only a small share of this figure, so most of it is modeled from published rates and comparables (grades run from A, mostly documented, to C, mostly modeled).

The Calculation

Rupert Grint net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (50 of 60 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$218,682,359
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (10 of 60 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$12,076,436
Backend points, estimated
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 17 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$30,101,390
Endorsements, estimated (1 brand partnerships)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Residuals, estimated
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release
$58,425,820
TV: Come Fly with Me
Himself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: American Dad!
Liam; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Tracey Ullman's Show
Himself; guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Urban Myths
August "Gustl" Kubizek; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Snatch
Charlie Cavendish-Scott; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$8,000,000
TV: Sick Note
Daniel Glass; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$3,500,000
TV: The ABC Murders
Inspector Crome; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Servant
Julian Pearce; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$27,200,000
TV: Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts
Himself; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities
Walter Gilman; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
Investment returns on savings
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$111,700,085
Expenses
Representation fees
agent 10% + attorney 5%
-$56,093,626
Taxes
UK effective rates, year by year
-$127,145,553
Personal spending
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$105,190,477
Income tax on the Clay 10 payment, after the tribunal ruled against him
he took GBP 4.5M out of Clay 10 in 2011 and treated it as capital; HMRC called it income. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal in November 2024 and put the bill at GBP 1,801,060 for the 2011/12 year. A separate appeal over the timing of his accounting date had already gone against him in 2019.
-$2,290,000
Estimated net worth$194,937,937

Film by Film

Rupert Grint film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetBox officePay counted
Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$3,000,000
Nightborn
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$3,000,000
A Little More (Ed Sheeran song)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Lead$3,000,000
Knock at the Cabin
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2023Lead$20,000,000$54,800,000$2,999,999
Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Lead$2,999,998
Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,999,998
Pena De Prata
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Supporting$2,999,996
Saleka
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,999,996
Servant
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,999,996
Servant
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2018Lead$2,999,966
The ABC Murders
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2018Lead$2,999,966
Sick Note
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Lead$2,999,933
Snatch
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M
2017Lead$10,000,000$83,557,872$1,499,968
Urban Myths
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Lead$2,999,933
Tracey Ullman's Show
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2016Supporting$599,978
Enemy of Man
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Favorite Breakthrough Performance (Male)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Favorite Funny Performance
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
It's Only a Play
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Moonwalkers
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$135,622$2,999,746
Tom Gates
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Supporting$599,958
"Struck by Lightning"
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Harry Potter and the Escape from Gringotts
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Hogwarts Express
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
It's Only a Play
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Postman Pat: The Movie
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Supporting$8,600,000$599,918
Underdogs
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M
2014Lead$21,000,000$32,768,940$3,149,505
CBGB
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M
2013Lead$5,000,000$40,400$749,790
Charlie Countryman
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2013Lead$424,404$424,404$63,661
Mojo
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2013Lead$2,999,036
American Dad!
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Supporting$599,690
Favourite Film Star ( under 25 )
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Holidays at Home are Great
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Into the White
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$712,216$2,998,123
National Space Centre (England)
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Supporting$599,690
Over the Rainbow
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Come Fly with Me
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Supporting$599,396
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2011Lead$250,000,000$1,341,511,219$15,749,689
IGN
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Lead$2,996,346
Lego House
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Lead$2,996,346
Red Nose Day 2011
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Supporting$599,396
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2010Lead$250,000,000$976,536,918$15,731,214
Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2010Lead$2,992,891
Wild Target
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M
2010Lead$8,000,000$3,500,000$1,197,342
Best Ensemble
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2009Lead$2,987,838
Cherrybomb
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2009Lead$1,000,000$30,143$150,000
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1)
2009Lead$250,000,000$933,959,197$19,906,307
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2007Lead$150,000,000$941,676,843$11,610,932
Driving Lessons
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2006Lead$1,300,000$2,912,811
The Queen's Handbag
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2006Lead$2,912,811
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2005Lead$150,000,000$895,921,036$11,069,560
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2004Lead$130,000,000$797,361,618$10,444,639
BBC Radio 4
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79)
2003Supporting$1,878,416
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2003Lead$100,000,000$879,793,867$9,414,443
British Critic's Circle
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2002Lead$2,141,290
Emma Watson
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2002Lead$2,141,290
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2002Lead$100,000,000$879,793,867$7,909,170
Thunderpants
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms
2002Lead$7,000,000$3,000,000$852,815
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2001Lead$125,000,000$978,087,613$6,056,818
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2001Lead$125,000,000$1,029,000,000$6,056,818

How the modeled figures work. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our methodology page.

Net Worth Over Time

$50M$100M$150M20002006201220182026$194.9 Million2000: $831,8002001: $5,052,6332002: $9,628,9472003: $15,138,1752004: $20,316,5482005: $24,386,6312006: $28,652,0252007: $32,840,0872008: $32,548,3042009: $42,255,7572010: $51,380,7072011: $59,845,6972012: $67,842,7992013: $77,426,4592014: $86,828,2722015: $92,213,4032016: $98,458,2672017: $109,955,4472018: $113,370,6042019: $127,482,8642020: $139,869,2442021: $155,838,6772022: $147,791,2762023: $163,780,6672024: $175,601,2612025: $190,108,1072026: $194,937,937

Modeled balance at the end of each year, matching the year-by-year table below.

Year by Year

Rupert Grint year by year model
YearIncomeRep feesTax rateSpentSavedBalance
2026$4,282,184$642,32840%$1,203,773$980,141$194,937,937
2025$4,038,216$605,73240%$1,135,191$924,299$190,108,107
2024$1,058,919$158,83840%$364,209$175,840$175,601,261
2023$8,226,644$1,233,99740%$2,312,608$1,882,980$163,780,667
2022$11,231,113$1,684,66740%$3,157,201$2,570,667$147,791,276
2021$14,967,965$2,245,19540%$4,207,674$3,425,987$155,838,677
2020$10,150,112$1,522,51740%$2,853,318$2,323,239$139,869,244
2019$5,290,219$793,53340%$1,487,144$1,210,868$127,482,864
2018$12,115,171$1,817,27640%$3,405,720$2,773,017$113,370,604
2017$15,429,943$2,314,49140%$4,337,542$3,531,729$109,955,447
2016$5,248,931$787,34040%$1,475,538$1,201,417$98,458,267
2015$14,180,600$2,127,09040%$3,986,337$3,245,769$92,213,403
2014$19,237,860$2,885,67940%$5,407,993$4,403,315$86,828,272
2013$12,786,576$1,917,98640%$3,594,460$2,926,694$77,426,459
2012$17,316,233$2,597,43540%$4,867,801$3,963,478$67,842,799
2011$28,308,766$4,246,31540%$7,957,934$6,479,537$59,845,697
2010$27,137,912$4,070,68740%$7,628,793$6,211,542$51,380,707
2009$27,827,501$4,174,12540%$7,822,644$6,369,381$42,255,757
2008$11,681,156$1,752,17340%$3,283,713$2,673,676$32,548,304
2007$13,250,951$1,987,64340%$3,725,001$3,032,984$32,840,087
2006$12,536,394$1,880,45940%$3,524,131$2,869,430$28,652,025
2005$14,836,331$2,225,45040%$4,170,671$3,395,858$24,386,631
2004$19,481,969$2,922,29540%$5,476,615$4,459,189$20,316,548
2003$20,600,789$3,090,11840%$5,791,129$4,715,273$15,138,175
2002$20,658,792$3,098,81940%$5,807,434$4,728,550$9,628,947
2001$18,442,168$2,766,32540%$5,184,315$4,221,191$5,052,633
2000$3,634,091$545,11440%$1,021,587$831,800$831,800

Model Notes

  • RESIDENCE PROXY: Hertfordshire estate, so UK rates apply throughout
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • UK filing check: attributable company net assets $33,477,181 (Clay 10 Limited (07724029, GBP 30,050,660 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%); Eevil Plan Properties Limited (08571078, GBP 75,037 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
  • Image credit: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Rupert Grint)
Reproduce this number. A net worth estimate should be reproducible the way a scientific finding is: the same public inputs and the same published rates should always give the same answer. Film budgets and box office are public reporting. Every disclosed salary, fee rate, tax rate, savings rate, and benchmark return is published with citations on our methodology page. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $194.9 Million.

Methodology

We rebuild Rupert’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

The full model, every rate table, and how our estimates have checked out against real deals are on the methodology page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rupert Grint's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Rupert Grint's net worth is an estimated $194.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Rupert Grint make money?

Film salaries and documented backend participation.

How is Rupert Grint's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Rupert actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Rupert Grint make per film?

It varies by role and era, and the film-by-film table above lists the pay counted for every title. Disclosed paydays enter as reported. Undisclosed roles are modeled from what comparable actors earned in the same era and budget range, with lead roles after the breakthrough earning the most and supporting or early roles a documented fraction of that.

Why is the tax rate so high, and don't actors avoid it with a loan-out company?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Rupert lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

Why is this figure different from other net worth sites?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the methodology page lists every source.

How accurate is this estimate?

No net worth estimate for a private individual is exact; this one is a model built from public data. The difference is that you can see how it was built and check every step. The confidence grade near the top of the calculation shows how much of the figure rests on disclosed numbers, and the page flags where a number leans on an assumption.

Is Rupert Grint rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $194.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Rupert Grint's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $218.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Rupert Grint make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Rupert: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explore Other Actors

About NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Read more about NetWorth Explained.